Background and Context
An 8-year-old child from a large family. They are intellectually bright, with strong interests in specific areas of knowledge and a deep engagement with factual information. At home, they were described as easily irritated, needing things to be “just so,” and becoming quickly agitated when expectations were not met.
Although not formally diagnosed, their mother described behaviours consistent with Autism Spectrum Disorder, including sensory overload, literal thinking, social communication differences, coordination difficulties, and a strong sense of fairness. The child also struggled with emotional regulation, sometimes becoming physically aggressive towards a younger sibling.
The referral for Drawing and Talking came from the mother, who wanted support to help the child feel calmer and sleep better. The child had not previously received any structured emotional support.
Emotional Communication Before Intervention
The child’s emotional expression was very limited. They would say “everyone is annoying,” but could not elaborate. Attempts by adults to suggest feelings often led to anger. Emotions escalated quickly into behaviour, with little opportunity for reflection.
Engagement with Drawing and Talking
The child initially engaged enthusiastically, often wanting to extend sessions. This shifted into attempts to control session timing, followed by resistance in sessions four to six, including leaving early and not attending.
The Practitioner maintained consistent boundaries while keeping the space available. A turning point came in session seven, when the child returned, accepted the structure, and began attending regularly. From this point, sessions became more settled and predictable.
How Autistic Traits Shaped the Process
The child approached drawing in a literal and concrete way, often rejecting imaginative prompts (“That’s not real”). Their drawings were detailed and based on familiar visual narratives rather than symbolic expression.
They responded well to reflective language, initially with laughter, and later with clear enjoyment. A key challenge for the Practitioner was resisting interpretation, particularly when recurring themes suggested underlying relational dynamics. Remaining non-directive required careful professional discipline.
Although outwardly settled, the child frequently checked the clock, highlighting a need for predictability.
Emotional Expression and Regulation
Over time, the child’s storytelling became more fluid. While emotional insight within sessions remained subtle, their mother reported that they began expressing frustrations more verbally at home.
Themes of power and control recurred in drawings. The child also began showing small signs of emotional awareness, including warmth towards a younger sibling.
The mother reported fewer meltdowns and improved regulation. In sessions, the child showed less need to control timing, suggesting increased trust and internal safety.
Relationship and Psychological Safety
The relationship developed in stages: strong initial engagement, followed by resistance, and then a more secure connection once boundaries were consistently held.
After session seven, a noticeable shift occurred. By the end of the intervention, the child asked to continue and expressed a wish to return “just to say hi,” indicating a meaningful sense of connection and safety.
Impact Beyond the Sessions
At home, the child became less physically reactive and more willing to share their drawings.
A notable shift was also seen in the parent, who became increasingly curious about their child’s inner world and began seeking additional support, reflecting a wider impact beyond the individual sessions.
Challenges and Adaptations
The child often remained fixed in rigid narratives and resisted imaginative expansion. The Practitioner adapted by accepting short responses, using reflection, and supporting the development of emotional language without directing content.
Small adjustments included providing more physical space and introducing a five-minute warning before the end of sessions, which reduced anxiety and supported regulation.
The consistent availability of the full 30-minute session remained essential.
Practitioner Reflection
The Practitioner observed that Drawing and Talking enabled the child to develop greater expressive capacity within a non-threatening space, despite initial difficulties with emotional communication.
The process highlighted how children who struggle to verbalise experiences can benefit from a structured yet non-directive approach that allows expression without pressure.
Key Messages for Practitioners
- Develop your understanding of autism to better support each child’s experience
- Don’t be alarmed by rigid or unusual narratives, these may reflect different ways of processing
- Progress may be subtle; consistent attendance is a meaningful indicator of impact
- If a child continues to attend, it often suggests the space is experienced as safe and beneficial
.png)
.png)